What's the difference between Presumed Consent or Opt-Out?

You may have been hearing the term “presumed consent” or “opt-out” when it comes to organ and tissue donation around the world. Presumed consent is a donation system by which adults over the age of 18 are automatically considered willing donors of organs and tissues after death unless they have taken the necessary legal steps to “opt out.” The UK is the most recent country to adopt legislation that supports this.

The United States operates under an opt-in, first-person consent system

The United States operates under an opt-in, first-person consent system. This means individuals must actively sign up on the donor registry and, upon doing so, no further authorization is required when the decision of the donor is legally documented. In Wyoming, an individual opt-ins to be an organ, eye and tissue donor when he or she signs up as a donor at their local Driver Services office or at DonateLifeWyoming.org.

How do Wyomingites feel about a presumed consent system?

Wyomingites do not support a presumed consent system: Research commissioned in 2011 found that 62% of Wyoming respondents were opposed to an “opt-out” or presumed consent system. Many respondents viewed this pronouncement as one deemed by the government, not one of their own choosing. This could spur many to opt out, not wanting to be mandated to be a donor, though not necessarily due to a lack of support or belief in organ and tissue donation.

What you need to know:

The idea of a presumed consent system may sound logical and the perfect way to address the rising need for organs and tissues for transplant. However, before you start advocating for it, here are a few facts about how a presumed consent system works and why it may not be the best idea for organ and tissue donation in the United States.

  • No systems operate as true presumed consent models: While it has been enacted in several Western European countries, in practice most of these systems are implemented as family authorization, with families effectively able to override the presumption of consent.
  • Presumed consent removes the opportunity for discussion with the family: Under the current opt-in system, organ procurement organizations have the opportunity to discuss donation with the family of any potential donor. In our area, authorization rates for organ donation are near 90%. An opt-out system would remove that opportunity for family discussion.
  • Presumed consent is not in alignment with American legal principles: Generally, laws in our country are built heavily on the core concepts of individual rights and liberties. Presumed consent may be contrary to these fundamental legal principles. Although the idea of presumed consent may sound promising, a change of this magnitude may affect the public’s trust of the organ and tissue donation system.
  • Neither would not make more organs available for transplant: Finally, data suggests moving to an opt-out system would not make more organs available for transplant in the U.S. Under our voluntary, opt-in system, more than 70% of Americans who meet the criteria to donate actually become organ donors after their death. This results in over 25 organ donors per million population, which is the second highest organ donation rate in the world. Major European countries with opt-out laws have donation rates that range from 11.4 to 20.6 organ donors per million, which is well below the U.S.

Want to learn more? Check out this recent piece in the Journal of the American Medical Association, “Success of Opt-In Organ Donation Policy in the U.S.